Handful of activists in Canada are exploring new ways to look at sex and disability
From
Daily Xtra in Toronto, Canada:
In
the still we see Loree Erickson in her wheelchair, her dress pulled
down to expose hard nipples and her head thrown back as co-star Sam
slides a gloved hand between her thighs.
The film, want, was Erickson and Sam’s first time making
porn. They were nervous, they fumbled, but what they’ve made is real and
sexy, and it’s getting us to rethink who’s desirable.
At the film’s premiere, one director said it was so hot, Erickson’s wheelchair just faded away. But the wheelchair is the point.
“That’s not part of my vision,” Erickson says, “that you have to make
any visible marker of my disability disappear so that you can see me as
sexy.”
Though she’s happy with the film and the overall response it’s
received, Erickson is clear that want was born of frustration. She’s
daily made to feel non-sexual. When she goes out, people compliment her
outfits, but she says no one picks her up. In queer porn, bodies like
hers aren’t shown. “It’s still skinny, white, hipster queers with
tattoos.”
Despite some improvement in recent years, with a wider range of
bodies represented, Erickson finds casts are still fairly homogeneous.
Andrew Morrison-Gurza, a master’s student researching public
perceptions of disability and the law, has felt similarly excluded. “I
don’t fit because I’m not walking, I don’t have a six-pack, I’m not six
foot two, and I don’t have an eight-inch dick,” he says, “so all of
those things together mean that I don’t fit this very structured
stereotype of what gay men are apparently looking for.”
Though he’s remarkably free of cynicism, Morrison-Gurza describes the
gay men’s community, with its “body beautiful” culture, as especially
wary of disability and says his sexuality often makes people
uncomfortable or perplexes them. Some assume he’s a virgin or that he
has no feeling in his legs. Others are thrown when he cracks dirty jokes
— something he particularly delights in.
Homophobia and transphobia can, of course, further suppress
sexuality. In the context of healthcare and home care, this is
especially disastrous. In Bent, a now-defunct online magazine
by and for queer disabled men, Randy Warren describes an unfortunate
incident with his caregiver, Todd. He’d been travelling for business,
and one night after going to sleep he woke up to a tongue in his ear. He
hadn’t told the caregiver he was gay, and Todd, assuming he was lonely,
decided to surprise him with a visit from a sex worker. It seriously
misfired. Not only had Todd failed to get Warren’s consent, he’d hired a
woman.
John Killacky, who had a spinal cord tumour removed 17 years ago,
remembers the clumsy handling of his sexuality by hospital staff.
Initially paralyzed from the neck down, he’d asked his hospital
psychologist about sex. She told him that since she wasn’t gay, she
couldn’t advise him. Other staff offered Killacky and his boyfriend a
video depicting sex between an able-bodied woman and a man with
quadriplegia. Killacky and his partner didn’t mind that there were no
gay materials but felt the video was condescending and unrealistic.
“The woman . . . picks the guy up, puts him in the bed like he’s a
little baby doll, gingerly gets in bed next to him, and rolls him on top
of her. And my heart broke,” Killacky says. He points out that the man
would not have been able to feel insertion, much less thrust, and was
stunned by the video’s insistence on man-on-top sex.
Like Erickson, writer and performer Leah Lakshmi Piepzna-Samarasinha
offers more appealing models of sex and disability. Two years ago, she
collaborated with Ellery Russian on Crip Sex Moments, a suite of
performances drawing on their own experiences, like the first time
Piepzna-Samarasinha had a lover with the same chronic illness as her and
the way this lover seduced her with gluten-free brunches and cane
foreplay.
Crip Sex Moments is just one of several pieces she’s created for Sins
Invalid, a project centring on performances by trans and queer people
of colour with disabilities (poster pictured).
“It’s really common for me to get a reaction from people who go,
‘Wow, there’s enough material around that for an entire show?’” But Sins
Invalid isn’t an arbitrary alliance of marginalized identities — and
Piepzna-Samarasinha explains that for her, the emphasis on race is
especially significant.
“It’s impossible for me to talk about chronic illness without talking
about environmental racism” — what she says is the disproportionate
exposure of people of colour and low-income communities to polluted and
otherwise degraded environments. In her first Sins Invalid performance,
Piepzna-Samarasinha describes growing up in a rustbelt town in
Massachusetts, what it felt like being at school, overpowered by the
smell wafting down from the abrasives plant, and how each year another
teacher developed alopecia or cancer.
And yet, the mainstream disability rights movement has been predominantly white.
“I came to disability studies with the hope that I was coming home,” says Syrus Marcus Ware,
a local artist, researcher and educator. As a queer, black, trans man
and identical twin with disabilities, Ware had sought a place that
embraced all facets of his identity but found the presumption of
whiteness to be pervasive. In other spaces, he often feels he has to
check his disabilities at the door.
“When I go to a black queer meeting, I’m only talking about that
issue,” he says, noting he feels he can’t question why the meeting’s on
the fourth floor and there’s no elevator.
In his art he explores how his full identity comes together,
referencing Audre Lorde, who wrote, “My fullest concentration of energy
is available to me only when I integrate all the parts of who I am.”
In 2005, Ontario enacted the Accessibility for Ontarians with
Disabilities Act (AODA), intended to accomplish what preceding
legislation could not: a barrier-free Ontario. New standards are rolling
out in stages, with an end date of Jan 1, 2025, and in its annual
reports, the province describes progress on customer service, employment
and transportation. But it’s unclear when critical AODA components,
like accessible building standards, will come into effect, and
on-the-ground change is slow.
“If we wait until 2025 to literally get in the door to our doctors or
our schools or our apartments, some of us won’t be here,” Ware says.
In his thesis proposal, Morrison-Gurza argues that legislation can
bring true accessibility only if we shift cultural attitudes,
particularly the idea that disability is a deficiency existing within an
individual, something that person must overcome to navigate the world,
rather than a social problem.
In fact, disability affects a growing number of us — currently one in
seven Canadians — and more as our population ages. Most of us need
support of some kind to live and fully participate in society: glasses
to see, inhalers to breathe, painkillers for our backs and so on. But we
don’t necessarily identify with the term “disability” or anticipate
future needs, making it easier to ignore accessibility issues.
Being sexual and desired should never be a prerequisite for access,
but it can be. Consider this: if your crush couldn’t get past the stairs
to your party, you’d choose an accessible venue. If they got migraines
from perfumes, you’d ask invitees not to wear them. Collectively, our
crushes could be a powerful force for change.
Conversely, when our bathhouses and parties don’t have ramps or
American Sign Language (ASL) interpretation, we’re not just failing to
consider access, we’re making implicit statements about who’s sexy, Ware
says. “What we’re saying is, we don’t anticipate or imagine anyone from
deaf communities and/or people from disability communities . . . to be a
desirable person, because if we did we would make sure that they could
come to the party.”
Queer feminist circles tend to be ahead of the curve when it comes to
these issues, but even within this community, Erickson finds that
theory often doesn’t translate into practice. Party organizers will post
mission statements outlining inclusive, anti-oppressive values but then
pick venues like Club120 because it’s sex-positive, ignoring the fact
that some invitees can’t get past the stairs.
And when events promise accessibility, they often neglect critical
details. A venue might have a ramp at the entrance, for example, but
washrooms located in the basement, or ASL interpretation might be
provided but with lighting too dim to properly see.
That’s not to say efforts aren’t being made. In 2011, Luke Anderson
and Michael Hopkins started up StopGap, a volunteer-driven project that
builds small wooden ramps for businesses. More than 100 businesses
across Toronto, and as far as Cranbrook, BC, have participated.
Anderson, who uses a wheelchair, explains that he and Hopkins were
inspired by their own workplace, where every day for six years they had
to deploy a temporary folder ramp so that Anderson could enter.
He admits that StopGap’s solution is temporary and imperfect, but it
spurs conversation, cuts through the municipal red tape required for
permanent ramps, and it’s better than waiting for 2025.
And people with disabilities are not the only ones to benefit — some
business owners have reported an increase in customers as more people
get through their doors, including parents with strollers.
Other affordable solutions exist. “People with disabilities are
actually really smart at figuring out how to do access on no money,”
says Piepzna-Samarasinha. “Oppressed people know best how to create a
space that works for us, so you just need to ask.”
But first, we need to want it — and a little pressure always helps.
To that end, Elisha Lim (who prefers the gender-neutral pronoun they)
started up a pledge to skip parties that aren’t wheelchair accessible:
“Why would I come to a party if my friends are barred?” they ask.
Their Facebook event page includes a list of venue recommendations,
including detailed accessibility information. At last count, 281 people
had signed up, and though momentum has slowed, more continue to join.
With broader participation, initiatives like these could help ensure
that more people are able to enter and navigate queer spaces.
Since its premiere in 2006, Erickson’s want has racked up awards and generated tremendous enthusiasm from audiences. Even her mother is now on board.
“It took her a while. She had to get there, but she’s like, ‘So you’re a pornstar. Well, I’m proud of you.”’
And Erickson’s just getting started. She recently wrapped up shoots
for some new films, and as part of her PhD dissertation, she’s enabling
others with disabilities to make porn, then interviewing participants
about how the process transforms their ideas of bodies and “fosters
resilience against cultures of undesirability.”
At its core, accessibility ensures everyone can participate in our
community. Films like Erickson’s go a step beyond, working to make those
with disabilities feel not only welcome, but truly wanted.